Adapt to SNAP
Navigating the EPA's final refrigerant rule
Although the immediate challenges are significant, in reality, U.S. EPA's Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Rule 20 can be a great new business opportunity for you and your company. Let our experts explain all the implications of the new rule for your business.
FAQ : Adapt to SNAP: Navigating the EPA's final refrigerant rule
On August 8, 2017, the DC Circuit Court ruled that the EPA only had statutory authority to delist ozone depleting substances and to offer alternatives to them. Once a CFC or HCFC refrigerant has been discontinued, it stated, the EPA has no authority to require an equipment manufacturer or a user move away from a non-ODP refrigerant, like HFCs.
The Court did not agree to hear an appeal of this case, so the rules have been sent back to EPA for revision. They are no longer in effect.
While the future is uncertain, there are many good reasons to continue to move to low GWP refrigerants:
- If the Kigali Amendment is ratified by the Senate, it will result in the US phasedown
- The SNAP case could be heard by the US Supreme Court and overturned
- California's Air Resources Board is developing regulations to phase HFCs out for that state; other states may follow
- Canada ratified the Kigali Amendment and continues to implement regulations banning certain HFC refrigerants
- The Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol requires an HFC phasedown in much of the world outside the US
- Many users have already made commitments to phase out HFCs and we expect that trend to continue
- Acceptable substitute refrigerants may improve system efficiency, which benefits everyone
- As the global market demand for HFC refrigerants declines, HFC refrigerant pricing is increasing
US ratification of the Kigali Amendment would require some type of implementation structure. That could be the SNAP program, some kind of refrigerant allocation, or another scheme.