From a broader perspective there are more advantages with a CO2 plant than just the economical profitability that you get up front together with less damaging impact on the environment when you compare CO2 with HFC.
- In the cooling process a CO2 plant develops an amount of heat which gives you the possibility for heat reclaim, which can be used for heading of the remaining buildings.
- The heat surplus can also be used for heat driven air condition systems (sorption) which can then be used as air condition in the buildings.
- As many synthetic refrigerants are imposed with a duty or are in the risk of having duties added companies who switch to CO2 will also be minimizing the economical risk linked with using a refrigerant regulated by political measures.
Establishing a CO2 plant today is slightly more expensive than a traditional HFC plant but there are indications that the prices are becoming more alike.
What are the environmental “savings”?
By changing to CO2 the yearly potential for environmental “savings” can be illustrated with an example from a Danish supermarket chain. The example is calculated on approximately 800 stores with a number of different plant sizes:
- Yearly leakage (10% of the plans charge) equal to apx. 18 mio. kg. CO2
- Yearly energy savings with CO2 (10%) equal to apx. 1 mio. kg. CO2
- Total yearly reduction of apx 19 mio. kg. CO2
If this is converted to driven km in a modern car, releasing 99 g. CO2 per km. (eg Golf Blue Motion) this equals:
- 193 mio. km. or
- Almost 13,000 cars yearly emission at 15,000 km/year
|